Fur: A fashion statement for some, while a cruel death sentence for others - Instablogs
Fur: A fashion statement for some, while a cruel death sentence for others
Pooja , Shimla: Jun 19 2007
Made Popular Jun 19 2007

Fur: A fashion statement for some, while a cruel death sentence for othersHanging by the neck from a wire noose, water is poured down their throat through a hose until they drown. Many are skinned while still alive!

This is the ground reality of ‘fur advertisements’ which every now and then hit our television screens or could be seen adorning the magazines. But the sorry state of affairs is that no one realizes that numerous living creatures have sacrificed their life just for the sake of these stunning and ravishing garments.

Nearly, two million killings (of cats and dogs) are carried out in China alone annually, just for the heck of so called fashion, majority of populace are taking the notion of killing the innocent animals, lightly. Investigators documented 50,000 to 100,000 cat pelts stockpiled at animal by-product factories in China.

Little Animals, Big Suffering

Millions of fur-bearing animals including foxes, raccoons, minks, coyotes, bobcats, lynxes, opossums, nutria, beavers, muskrats, otters, and others are killed each year on fur farms by anal and vaginal electrocution and in the wild by drowning or trapping. Can you beat that?

Up to 8,000 animals are loaded onto each truck, with cages stacked on top of each other. Cages containing live animals are commonly tossed from the top of the trucks onto the ground 10 feet below, shattering the legs of the animals inside them.

During genital electrocution, the killer attaches an alligator clamp to the animal’s ear and another to her labia and flips a switch, or plugs the wire into the wall socket, sending a jolt of electricity through the animal’s skin down the length of their body. The poor creature jerks and then stiffens.

But, according to biologist Leslie Gerstenfeld-Press, although the electrical current stops the heart, it does not kill the animal: In many cases, the animal remains conscious.

If the situation will continue to grow like this, then time is not far when, these animals would become the next endangered species on this planet.

Grim statistics postulate:

Nearly, 31 million animals are killed on fur ranches each year.
About twenty-six million are mink.
4.5 million Fox
250,000 Chinchillas
150,000 Sable
100,000 Fitch
100,000 Raccoon dogs



Fur industry, a bane for the animals:

Instead of lounging around the family home, some cats and dogs have been enhancing the outfits of high profile people in some countries.

If we look at the past decade, we’ll find that various species of animals were nearly at the verge of extinction, including the Juan Fernandez, Guadelupe and Antarctic fur seals and the sea otter. Fortunately these populations are recovering. However, now many spotted cat species are endangered because of the fur trade.

Even when species are protected, there will always be poachers willing to break the law for the big money someone will pay for a rare pelt. In April 1995 WSPA undercover investigators were offered illegal ocelot skins for sale in Brazil.

EU proposes to put ban on cats and dog fur

In order to avert the consequences, the European Parliament has supported a proposal which restricts the import of fur. Members of the European Parliament (MEP) have postulated that in majority of the cases, customers unintentionally procure it because the exporters tend to affix false labels to the products.

Labour MEP Arlene McCarthy asserted,

Many people are unwittingly deceived into buying garments made out of cat and dog fur due to mislabeling. This law will put an end to these deceptive practices.

There’s hardly any product left untouched, it is extensively used in coats, linings for boots and gloves, stuffed toys, and even homeopathic aids for arthritis.

Proposal of the ban would give weight-age to already existing similar prohibition in the EU member states and the United States, the foundations of which was laid down in 2003, in where more than half of the members signed a document backing the ban.

Yes, there’s a way out!

As has been said earlier, when synthetic fur is readily available in the market then there’s no point of slaughtering these poor creatures. It is expected that by barring these profanity, the authorities are moving in right direction. Also I’d like to add that culprits who are still carrying this horrible deed must be punished in such a manner that people might think twice before taking it as their profession.

But above all these things, people who are in the field of advertising and making garments, especially designers must speak out publically about the sensitized issue, it would then be instrumental in generating a strong message towards anti- fur campaigns.

Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
1 Stars
Nivedita
New Delhi, India
I used to think of homo sapiens as the most sophisticated creation on earth and had faith that it will redeem the earth of misery unitedly. But not anymore! What can one say about a species that is so hopelessly vain, ruthless and dumb to kill animals instead of compromising on something as petty as fashion.
2 Stars
Did anyone watch that video? It’s so brutal and barbaric.

That’s simply the ruthless slaughter for the sake of up-to-the-minute fashion. Everyone should vow not to use real fur and the vicious people associated with this business should be dealt unsympathetically like the way they deal with those speechless animals.
2 Stars
Vikas Shekhawat instablogs.com
Churu, Rajasthan, India
The European Parliament’s move to ban cat and dog fur imports won’t do any help, as – First, you just can’t stop China, don’t ask why - they eat dog meat there. Second, it’s not sellers, it’s buyers who’re the main culprits, go catch Paris Hilton for that if you can (Oops she’s already in jail, but, of course, for the wrong cause - not for wearing and buying fur). Third, what about fur market of animals who die natural death, why should thousands of people involved in this suffer – I mean – when you don’t have the might and brains to ban tobacco altogether, you even do not have any right to suck in millions of dollars from smokers suffering from lung and throat cancers via insurance agencies, health organizations, et al. – can the government, instead of still mulling over the matter, impose the ban straightaway on all no-vegetarians who too are directly responsible for slaughtering animals – Why so much fuss on animal fur and not on animal flesh? No…it can’t be, this is what we call ‘Circle of Life’...isn’t it?
0 Stars
Ravneet
New Delhi, India
I totally agree with Vikas. THis is a vicious circle which would go on unless a link is unplugged.

Slaughter of animals for fur, flesh or anything would go on. No stopping this, I think.
1 Stars
Gagandeep
Shimla, India
To mix up animal slaughter for fur and for other uses, eating for instance, is fundamentally wrong. While the ethical questions involved might be similar to a degree, the fact of the matter is there are other considerations involved. An animal who has been unfortunate enough to be run over by a truck can easily be consumed as meat (without any moral issues), but its fur of course is rendered useless due to disfiguration. The reason behind meting out such cruel deaths to animals is same. To skin them alive is to keep their fur intact.

So what Mr. Vikas proposes or at least thinks amounts to stretching a concept too far. Is it even conceivable to ask all the non-vegs to become vegetarians all of a sudden? Do you forget that hunting for food was a part of human survival even before the dawn of agriculture.

Killing for fur is a different matter because the species involved usually are endangered and their end-product i.e fur clothes do nothing except satiating the vanity-needs of the so called rich elites. Is that same as a poor guy fishing because he cannot afford brown bread? That is for you to decide.

Pooja hits the nail on the head in saying that fashion designers must come out against the hateful concept - it is after all, they who present fur clothes as must haves. And Yet killing would not stop unless buying stops. Banning such clothes is but a small step towards ending the inhumane practice.

P.S.: I’m a strict vegetarian.
3 Stars
There is nothing wrong with the fur trade. It is very much like the meat trade. Human beings won’t stop consuming meat because the human body is designed to eat meat and vegetables both. Our forefathers hunted down animals and ate them along with the forage they collected from the woods.

Similarly, humans had been wearing animal fur and skin from times immemorial to protect themselves from extreme weathers. Look at the Eskimos, the Siberians and some African tribes, etc. Over the ages it has become traditional symbols. In the last 100 years or so, fur has become a kind of status symbol and a fashion statement. That fact notwithstanding, fur provides warm and cozy clothing in cold regions. Now, if someone can sell artificial fur to the tribes of Tundra or the Eskimos that will be a different story.

Coming to socialites wearing fur for fashion, I have no problems with that either because it is like having a good non-veg dinner at a fine restaurant.

My only concern is that there must be a ban on hunting wild animals as it endangers the species that has far reaching ramifications on the environment. Killing farm-bred animals is OK either for fur or for meat.

There must be humane way for animal slaughter where the animal is killed painlessly killed be it for fur or for meat. That should solve the problem.

Unfortunately, animals are slaughtered barbarically and sadistically for both the meat and the fur industry. That’s what must stop.
Add your Comment